Eisenberg
Lawrence S. Eisenberg is a leader in the quest to hold hospitals and physicians responsible for their actions. I naturally thought of him within the context of the following story, which proves we need even more people of his high character and professional skill.
The January 16th News: Analysis and Commentary section of Business Week (businessweek.com) looks at the trials and tribulations of Mirjana Lukic of Escondido, California, and James Chen and Rey Young of Huntington Beach, the dentists who talked her into allowing 13 of her teeth to be extracted and a lot of her jaw removed to relieve her headaches. Otherwise, they warned her, she will get cancer and die from neuralgia inducing cavitational osteonecrosis (NICO). The headaches persisted after the oral surgery and eventually the lawsuit by Aetna in her behalf, which raised questions by the FDA, was settled out of court. Aetna says, as result of this case, it discovered 429 claims improperly filed for NICO treatment. While this case may seem a rare example of dental quackery, the potential for tapping boomer dollars has not been overlooked by a new breed of cosmetic dentists, a lucrative specialty not recognized by state dental boards, yet offering smile makeovers and even dental facelifts via TV ads and 800 numbers, state of the art techniques and equipment, spa treatments and massages before and after the drilling. This fountain of youth approach to dentistry has not only prompted many heretofore mainstream dentists to advertise cosmetic procedures in order to keep up with the competition, but also produced a multitude of small claims cases clogging the courts due to vague or questionable contract terms, no written guarantees, cash in advance, non-refundable deposits, waivers of liability, exorbitant fees and patients dissatisfied with results.
The bottom line is, dont say Ahhhhh unless its to a medical doctor with lots of malpractice insurance -- Your cosmetic dentist views your oral cavity as real estate and will be smiling all the way to the bank.
Reprinted article first published on PRLaw Inc Lawyers and Business Executives website, on 1-12-06 at prlawinc.typepad.com, ghost-written by Lori Carangelo to promote attorneys who defend victims of malpractice and civil rights violations. See prlawinc.typepad.com/lawyers_and_business_exec/ 2006/01/is_this_dental_.html
One of the most comprehensive websites for vicitms of dental malpractice is at www.lawinfo.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/ Client.lawarea/categoryid/222 It provides a by-state search feature to help you find a dental malpractice attorney in your area and explains what is generally considered dental malpractice.
The legal definition of dental malpractice varies from state to state. However, a general description of dental malpractice that is consistent from state to state would be described as medical malpractice for an injury due to negligent dental work, failure to diagnose or treat possible precarious oral conditions, delayed diagnosis or treatment of oral disease or other precarious oral conditions, as well as any malevolent or otherwise intentional misconduct on the dental professional's part. Generally speaking, in order for you to have a viable dental malpractice lawsuit claim, the dental care provider must have unintentionally or intentionally committed an act that no other reasonable prudent oral healthcare provider would have committed during the same time period, and that act must have caused significant injury.
In addition to having the duty to provide a certain acceptable standard of care, a dental care provider must also obtain your informed consent for any treatment you receive. The treatment provided also must not exceed the consent you've given because you do have the right to decide what treatment you receive. If the dental care provider does not obtain your informed consent or the treatment you receive exceeds the informed consent you gave, it may be grounds for you to bring a dental malpractice lawsuit. Keep in mind, though, that dentists cannot guarantee results, so a dental malpractice claim cannot be brought because the treatment you received wasn't successful or didn't meet your expectations.
A dental malpractice lawsuit can only be brought if the dental professional violates the acceptable standard of dental care and if you suffered an injury due the dental professional breaching that standard of care as a result of his or her incompetence, negligence or intentional misconduct. In some cases a dentist or dental professional may be found guilty of intentionally injuring or committing improper conduct (molesting a patient while he/she is under sedation) against a patient. In short, dentist's violation of the standard of care, whether it be unintentional or intentional must be the clear probable cause of the harm suffered by you. Contact a dental malpractice lawyer to find out if you have a dental malpractice lawsuit claim.
If you are a victim of any of these or other injuries or bad dental practices, you may be eligible for monetary compensation by pursing a dental malpractice lawsuit claim.
Anyone who saw the movie "Marathon Man" has probably never again gone to a dentist. In the movie, actor Dustin Hoffman was tortured by an evil dentist who drilled and extracted several of his teeth without Novacaine in an attempt to gain information Hoffman didn't know. (Ow!!) Anyone who has any kind of dental horror story may find solace by posting their experiences and questions on message boards. Here's one:
www.writersdigest.com/mbbs/forum/ forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1296
Becky and Doc Hemp
This web page would not be complete without a link to DOC HEMP's humongous website. This most unique website by a tell-it-like-it-is dentist with a quirky sense of country dentist humor has lots of stories about his patients and pastimes (including collector cars and racing) set to musical backgrounds, as well as seriously useful information and loads of color photos of actual dental work in progress (not for the squeamish). When last visited, Doc Hemp was still replying to emails and love to give free advice (:
The owners and creators of this website will not be held liable for telling it like it is. The Truth is not libel. And what we offer here is a collection and display of documented information identifying verifiable public records and private or individual reporting sources.
Our intention in building and maintaining this web site is to make all information available for others to access and view for educational purposes, and to encourage sharing and communication among interested persons. It is not the intention of this site to violate trademark or copyright laws and it is hoped that all contributors will do their best to accurately and completely identify sources and/or avoid copyright infringement when submitting information, signed, c/o AmFOR's PO Box mailing address. Due to the popularity of this site's free self-help services, we were inundated with e-mail seeking personal assistance, so had to omit e-mail contact. Comments posted to our Petition is monitored, so spam and posts that are inappropriate or made in error to the Petition or Donor Offspring/Parent Registry are deleted.
There is no intention to profit for money for any reason. This site is designed to provide a safe place for persons to document the Truth with the hope th at all information is presented in good faith and with accuracy. Together we can make a difference.
Date Last Updated: April 21, 2008
© 2001, 2002 and forward by Lori Carangelo.
All Rights Reserved
PO Box 401, Palm Desert, CA 92261 USA